Sembra che il terremoto de L’Aquila e di parte della sua provincia abbia aperto la strada a tutti quei provvedimenti che più volte erano stati proposti e che da più parti, ovviamente da Confedilizia in primo luogo, erano stati non solo contestati, ma anche contrastati con successo nelle rispettive sedi di competenza. Alla insurance against natural disasters (but they always?) on which we expressed our opinion in the weeks before - with particular reference to what is already paid by homeowners for the reclamation work on streams of varying importance and without considering what is already being taken for the same reason, out of general taxation - is now added to an old warhorse by lobby interested in creating this new bussiness: the book home. We could not miss, of course, among those pushing for the establishment of this instrument, the Appeals rejected several times by us promoted, ANCI, always ready to impose charges for condominium owners and home. The association mentioned not only reiterated the adoption of the "house book", but also advances the claim to indicate the solutions to achieve its purpose, suggesting that the book "is written in a form simplified by removing all the problematic aspects that have caused the use of Tar Confedilizia.
Anci is forgotten, however, deliberately, that the question of the book can not be simply resolved by the "simplified" means the law - as stated clearly and verbatim from the Judgement of Tar - "not subject to modification and works on buildings of any generalized gender, age and condition. Consequently, Again according to which we refer, investigations in order to avoid excessive costs and without regard to their weight on the economic conditions of the owners, should be recommended only in cases of obvious and inevitable need not be deferred, if necessary with the graduation of remedies accomplish. "
evident then that the booklet home is connected only to cases of necessity "obvious, inevitable and can not be postponed! But probably - certainly contrary - the Anci, always ready to pontificate, should have the decency to continue the sentencing of Tar. In so doing learn that the same rule also says this: "Nor can it be argued that, after all, the file serves to maximize security and prevent tragedies such as those related to collapse of entire buildings, since, in the present cases (cases of collapse, ed), failed not the case on the building, but a careful control public that it would take time for exercise and that the PA and he is eligible to play regardless of the existence of the dossier. "
We would like to point out to his hip and authoritative representatives of the tragic event that earthquake in Italy - and were no less than other pseudo natural disasters occurred in the last fifty years - would have had to learn much more important and more comprehensive information than just a "house book". Among these, for example, the need for local authorities (which would be a simple act due) to carry out their supervisory duties on the projects presented and, even more, the observance of standards, of course, also the earthquake, all ' act of constructing buildings that would not be the most important task?
0 comments:
Post a Comment